Hashim Amla, Terrorist, Dean Jones
It appears that the only thing that some need to justify a conviction on the grounds of terrorism in this day and age is a Muslim sounding name and beard.

Dean Jones former Australian cricketer, coach and television commentator is in trouble. While commentating on a series of matches between South Africa and hosts Sri Lanka Dean Jones was heard on a live broadcast saying the word terrorist.

The “terrorist” in question is pictured above he is South African cricketer Hashim Amla. When the Amla took a catch Dean Jones’s comment that “the terrorist has got another wicket” was broadcast live throughout South Africa. In his defense Dean Jones claims that the comment was never supposed to have been transmitted on live air and that he thought that he was speaking in a commercial break.

For Mr. Jones to make such a comment one naturally assumes that this latter day Sherlock Holmes has done a great deal of forensic investigations and intelligence gathering in order to be able to “convict” Hashim Amla of the crime of terrorism. If you thought that then you would be completely and sadly mistaken. As far as I can see the only crimes that Hashim Amla has committed to warrant such a “conviction” are two fold:

(1) He is Muslim. How does “Detective” Dean Jones know this? Obviously his name is a dead give away.

(2) He has a beard.

With this second piece of evidence the case for the prosecution is sealed. There is no doubt that Hashim Amla must be a terrorist as he is a Muslim and he has a beard.

Guilt by association is a wonderful rule and can be used not only by Dean Jones to label Hashim Amla a terrorist it can also be used by me in the following manner:

Dean Jones is a white Australian by my reckoning. If I were to use our wonderful rule of guilt by association it means that Dean Jones is white, murdering and racist who is responsible for the genocide of Australia’s original inhabitants the Aborigines. What is good for the goose is good for the gander

As a result of his ” informed comment” Dean Jones has been sacked from his job as a free-lance television commentator:

“Jones, who makes most of his income from cricket commentary, will not work again for the world’s biggest producer of cricket.

“We’ve terminated Dean Jones’ freelance contract with immediate effect,” said Ray Reed, communications director for Taj TV, whose channel Ten Sports is beamed into 50 million households around the world.

“We’ve got a diverse cross-section of nationalities and religions working for us, so as a company we have a zero-tolerance policy regarding such comments. We’ve condemned the statement in the strongest possible terms.

“It’s an unfortunate situation. He made the comment when he felt it wasn’t going out on air. It was during an ad break (in Sri Lanka) but it was carried on the South African channel. Even off-air those comments aren’t acceptable within our company.”

Should he have been sacked ? I do not know. I am all for freedom of expression and as such Dean Jones was just articulating what he felt. Should he have lost his job for expressing the truth as he saw it? I leave that your better judgment.

Popularity: 1% [?]

Related posts:

  1. Court: Praising Israeli Terrorist Is Not Incitement Earlier today the Jerusalem Magistrate’s acquitted Michael Ben-Horin on...
  2. Mother Of George Bush Speaks About Christian Terrorist The conflict that pits the Christian terrorists of the...
  3. There Is No Western Media Bias Against Muslim Women… Honest A new study conducted by Saadia Izzeldin of Qatar...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.